The problem with conspiracy theorists, such as those who ask questions about the 9/11 attacks and the role of the U.S. in the Middle East, is that all too often they begin with relevant questions and detour off into conspiracy land based upon personal conjecture and hypothesis.

Unfortunately, this detour undermines their credibility with journalists and editors, as well as political and business leaders in our society. The most obvious point of contention, however, is not the credibility of the conspiracy theorists, but rather the credibility of the jury — the jury that is made up of the gatekeepers of American media and industries of influence.

While highly credible people have written books and spoken publicly regarding the very questionable statements made by our government regarding its involvement in the Middle East over the past several decades, the jury has failed to ask the most relevant questions. It has merely absorbed much of the information provided to it by the government while scrutinizing and often rejecting information provided to it from people and places outside of the realms it deems automatically acceptable (such as think tanks, individuals of former stature within the government and university scholars).

The question conspiracy theorists ought to ask is “what’s wrong with the jury?”

In my book, “The WHOLE Truh about the U.S. War on Terror: answers to every question you never knew to ask,” I ask and answer questions that most of the public has never heard before. Here are a few examples below:

• In the aftermath of WWII and prior to the formation of Israel, how much money did the U.S. government raise and provide to the Jews seeking to establish a homeland in the Palestine Mandate?
• Why does the Islamic world regard Israel as a “U.S.-created” state?
• What was the first western democratic nation to overthrow a Muslim democratic nation in the Middle East and when did this occur?
• Why was British Petroleum expelled from Iran in 1950 and why did the nation of Great Britain lose a subsequent lawsuit against Iran in a world court in 1952?
• Who was the Shah of Iran and what did human rights organizations say about him?
• What demands did the Iranian students require for the release of hostages during the 1979-80 Iranian Hostage Crisis?
• What was the role of the U.S. in the war between Iraq and Iran from 1980 – 1988?
• Why did the U.S. tell Saddam we were seeking to strengthen our friendship with him on July 25, 1990 … well after the accounts of numerous atrocities he committed were known worldwide?
• When did the U.S. make the decision to invade Iraq, and what was the rationale at the time of that decision?
• What exactly is Al-Qaeda, its history and the reason it has been fingered by the U.S. as an enemy?
• How many of the Iraqi leaders that assumed power after the second U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 had longstanding relationships with the CIA?

These questions and so many more are not asked nor answered by the jury. But they are asked and answered in my book, “The WHOLE Truth about the U.S. War on Terror: answers to every question you never knew to ask,” published by NewMediaPublishing.com.

Until Americans are willing to ask the hard questions and endeavor to understand the truth, we will continue to find ourselves muttering the mantra “why” over and over while those who have been victimized by our government will seek retaliation.

A war is going on in the Middle East that the U.S. is deeply involved in. That war was initiated by the U.S. and Great Britain. It has gone on unabated since 1953. The evidence is clear. It is indisputable. It is verifiable. It is well documented by legitimate resources in the media, the government, the universities and around the globe, yet within these very institutions of influence where the answers lie, few seek to put them all together and see the BIG PICTURE that indicts 11 U.S. presidents, congresses and media cohorts over several generations.

Even today, the facade continues to be held up to the American people as the truth, while the jury ignores relevant questions regarding the most significant attack on the U.S. since Pearl Harbor.

9/11 has its conspiracy theorists. But the questions that ought to be answered by enterprising news agencies and reporters seeking to expose the truth have not been pursued with vigor by the mainstream media and therefore have been left to those who write books and speak to small audiences.

The media cannot even produce the phantom plane that presumably attacked the pentagon. Apparently, it and all of its luggage, passengers, wheels, fuselage, seats, etc vaporized in the explosion while the building it supposedly hit sustained substantial but manageable damage.

The building in New York exploded into dust particles and the steel columns that were its core somehow were severed rather than melted. Such an anomaly has never occurred before or since and has yet to satisfy any of the questions asked by architects, structural engineers and other building experts. But the media has been satisfied.

Meanwhile, the third building that came down that day in New York isn’t of any interest to the media or its jury companions in congress and other leadership positions across the country. That building (WTC 7) wasn’t hit by a plane nor did it dissolve into its own footprint by itself, as presumably did the WTC towers north and south). Indeed, there is agreement that it was demolished upon an order given by the man who owned the building. Yet, no demolition crews entered that building that day. And while news crews filmed the subsequent explosion and fall of the 46-story building that resembled exactly how the main towers fell, to this day no one has or can answer the relevant questions regarding that event.

It is time Americans began demanding answers from their media and their leaders. But how can they know what to ask?

My book will provide hundreds of unanswered questions that I provide documentation for and meticulous researched answers that make perfectly good sense and provide a cohesive and comprehensive understanding of the WHOLE truth about the U.S. War on Terror and the tragedy of 9/11.

It is time for the jury to seek BOTH sides to the story, rather than relying solely upon a single source that has lied consistently and has zero credibility. That source is the government and its associates in politicized think thanks and university campuses.

The jury must not disregard new and relevant information if it believes the truth is a high priority and the goal of its deliberations.

Posted on August 18th, 2006 by admin
Filed under: thebook

Bookmark - del.icio.us | Digg it | Furl | reddit | Spurl | StumbleUpon |